Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: exposing pg_controldata and pg_config as functions
Date: 2016-02-17 21:31:22
Message-ID: 56C4E6AA.1020707@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/31/16 7:34 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I am marking this patch as returned with feedback for now, not all the
> issues have been fixed yet, and there are still no docs (the
> conclusion being that people would like to have this stuff, right?).
> Feel free to move it to the next CF should a new version be written.

I think we still don't have a real use case for this feature, and a
couple of points against it.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-02-17 21:38:22 Re: Figures in docs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-02-17 21:16:52 Re: [patch] Proposal for \crosstabview in psql