Re: Declarative partitioning

From: Josh berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: 2016-02-16 02:41:16
Message-ID: 56C28C4C.5090409@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/15/2016 04:28 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
> Also, you won't see any optimizer and executor changes. Queries will still
> use the same plans as existing inheritance-based partitioned tables,
> although as I mentioned, constraint exclusion won't yet kick in. That will
> be fixed very shortly.

We're not going to use CE for the new partitioning long-term, are we?
This is just the first version, right?

--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Langote 2016-02-16 02:46:34 Re: Declarative partitioning
Previous Message Chapman Flack 2016-02-16 02:12:36 Re: A bit of PG archeology uncovers an interesting Linux/Unix factoid