Re: Releasing in September

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Releasing in September
Date: 2016-01-20 17:42:28
Message-ID: 569FC704.4000907@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/20/2016 09:31 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> I think one thing we should work on, is being absolutely religious about
>> requiring, say, 2 reviews for every nontrivial contribution. We
>> currently seem to have a significantly increased submission rate, and at
>> the same time the number of reviews per patch has gone down
>> substantially. I think the "honor" system has failed in that regard.
>
> Good point, totally agree.
>
> So the project should try to think of new ideas on how to incentivise reviewing?
>
> I have three ideas so far:

4. Submit a patch, review a patch.

Don't review patches? Don't submit patches.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. http://the.postgres.company/
+1-503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-01-20 17:48:18 Re: Releasing in September
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-01-20 17:40:04 Re: Releasing in September