Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Date: 2016-01-13 13:30:43
Message-ID: 56965183.1080707@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc

On 13/01/16 14:27, Vladimir Sitnikov wrote:
> TL;DR: I suggest to create "generic plan" with regard to current bind values.
> What's wrong with that approach?

I don't understand how this is supposed to work. Say you already have a
plan which looks like this:

Seq Scan on foo (cost=0.00..100.00 rows=1 width=630)
Filter: (bar = $1)

Now the plan gets invoked with $1 = 5. What exactly in your mind would
happen here?

.m

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-13 13:36:06 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2016-01-13 13:28:10 Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vladimir Sitnikov 2016-01-13 13:36:06 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2016-01-13 13:28:05 Re: Fwd: [JDBC] Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102