Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, pokurev(at)pm(dot)nttdata(dot)co(dot)jp, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2016-01-13 06:16:59
Message-ID: 5695EBDB.3090800@lab.ntt.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2016/01/12 11:28, Vinayak Pokale wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2016 11:22 AM, "Amit Langote" <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2016/01/12 10:30, Amit Langote wrote:
>>> I'm slightly concerned that the latest patch doesn't incorporate any
>>> revisions to the original pgstat interface per Robert's comments in [1].
>>
>> I meant to say "originally proposed pgstat interface on this thread".
>
> Yes.
> Robert's comments related to pgstat interface needs to be address.
> I will update it.

So, I updated the patch status to "Waiting on Author".

Thanks,
Amit

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-01-13 08:19:03 Re: ExecGather() + nworkers
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-01-13 03:17:26 Re: checkpointer continuous flushing