Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Date: 2015-12-23 20:08:15
Message-ID: 567AFF2F.8050107@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/23/15 12:15 PM, Corey Huinker wrote:
> That's fair. I'm still at a loss for how to show that the fetch size was
> respected by the remote server, suggestions welcome!

A combination of repeat() and generate_series()?

I'm guessing it's not that obvious and that I'm missing something; can
you elaborate?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-12-23 20:31:31 Re: Using quicksort for every external sort run
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-12-23 20:02:24 Re: tracking owner of extension-managed objects