Re: [PATCH] Equivalence Class Filters

From: Jeremy Harris <jgh(at)wizmail(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Equivalence Class Filters
Date: 2015-12-08 09:52:47
Message-ID: 5666A86F.1040006@wizmail.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/12/15 16:44, Simon Riggs wrote:
> There are many optimizations we might adopt, yet planning time is a factor.
> It seems simple enough to ignore more complex optimizations if we have
> already achieved a threshold cost (say 10). Such a test would add nearly
> zero time for the common case. We can apply the optimizations in some kind
> of ordering depending upon the cost, so we are careful to balance the
> cost/benefit of trying certain optimizations.

Given parallelism, why not continue planning after initiating a
a cancellable execution, giving a better plan to be used if the
excecution runs for long enough?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2015-12-08 09:53:49 Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-12-08 09:31:10 Re: Making tab-complete.c easier to maintain