Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Date: 2002-06-14 13:22:46
Message-ID: 5661.1024060966@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> BTW: Tom, I noticed that temp schemas get added to the path before
> pg_catalog - I would have expected pg_catalog to always be first or have
> I missed something obvious?

It's open to debate I suppose. Past releases allow you to create and
use a temp table named the same as a system catalog, so I maintained
that behavior.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-06-14 13:24:28 Re: FW: Patch for current_schemas to optionally include implicit
Previous Message Dave Page 2002-06-14 10:14:18 CREATE LANGUAGE/pg_language docs