Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)dcc(dot)uchile(dot)cl>, "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Date: 2003-12-15 03:44:10
Message-ID: 5639.1071459850@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> (Note to self: I wonder whether the recently-added COMMENT ON LARGE
>> OBJECT facility works at all over dump/reload...)

> How do you mean? pg_dump never writes out the COMMENT ON commands...

Oh, okay, it doesn't work.

Care to think about how to fix that?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-12-15 03:53:44 Re: Resurrecting pg_upgrade
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-12-15 03:41:34 Re: fork/exec patch