Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation

From: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
To: Geoff Winkless <pgsqladmin(at)geoff(dot)dj>
Cc: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Peter Geoghegan *EXTERN* <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-committers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-committers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Date: 2015-09-24 10:33:43
Message-ID: 5603D187.8010301@archidevsys.co.nz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers


An example from a book on PostgreSQL server programming that I'm working
through (Note that it is obviously awkward to write with gender pronouns
when gender is irrelevant, note the "he she" in one place and "he/she"
in another!):

"If the user is a superuser, then he she has permission to see the
full query. If the user is a regular user, he/she will only see the
full query for his/her queries."

Written in 'Gender Appropriate' style (only refer to gender when it is
relevant):

"If the user is a superuser, then they have permission to see the
full query. If the user is a regular user, they will only see the
full query for their queries."

I think the second version is easier to read - and in this case, shorter!

-Gavin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2015-09-24 10:41:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-09-23 22:27:30 pgsql: Make ANALYZE compute basic statistics even for types with no "="

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Geoff Winkless 2015-09-24 10:41:07 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Use gender-neutral language in documentation
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-09-24 09:50:09 Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed