| From: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Adam Brightwell <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, 张元超 <zhangyuanchao(at)highgo(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydata(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: One question about security label command |
| Date: | 2015-09-22 22:03:46 |
| Message-ID: | 5601D042.8070103@joeconway.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/15/2015 11:36 AM, Joe Conway wrote:
> On 09/13/2015 10:29 AM, Kouhei Kaigai wrote:
>> The attached one is the regression test fixup in v9.2.
>> As we applied to the v9.3 or later, it replaces unconfined_t domain
>> by the self defined sepgsql_regtest_superuser_t.
> Thanks -- I'll look through this over the next day or two.
Took a bit longer than I thought but now pushed :-)
At this point all current branches should be passing the sepgsql
regression test. As a reminder, that would be:
rhino: 9.2 through master
agama: 9.1
Joe
--
Crunchy Data - http://crunchydata.com
PostgreSQL Support for Secure Enterprises
Consulting, Training, & Open Source Development
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2015-09-22 22:16:52 | Less than ideal error reporting in pg_stat_statements |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-22 21:56:54 | Re: Calculage avg. width when operator = is missing |