Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests
Date: 2015-09-17 15:55:59
Message-ID: 55FAE28F.1090906@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/17/2015 09:42 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I propose to have the pg_upgrade test honour TEMP_CONFIG as pg_regress
>> (or its Makefile) does, by applying the patch below. There might be
>> opther places this should also be done, but this would be a start.
> No objection to the concept, but I wonder if the -f test should
> instead be a -r test (in the original place too, I guess).
>
>

In the original place permissions are in effect tested in pg_regress.c.

I'll go ahead with -r.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2015-09-17 16:14:13 Re: [PATCH] Microvacuum for gist.
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2015-09-17 15:40:27 Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes