Re: WIP: Rework access method interface

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: WIP: Rework access method interface
Date: 2015-09-14 13:20:33
Message-ID: 55F6C9A1.7060701@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2015-09-14 14:34, Oleg Bartunov wrote:
>
> Whhat I don't understand from this thread if we should wait 2ndQuadrant
> for their sequence and column AMs or just start to work on committing it
> ? Alvaro, where are you ?
>

I don't see problems with this patch from the sequence am perspective.
The next AM type will need to add code for different AM types but that's
mostly it.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2015-09-14 13:25:45 Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Previous Message Teodor Sigaev 2015-09-14 13:20:07 pgsql: Check existency of table/schema for -t/-n option (pg_dump/pg_res