Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: "Thakur, Sameer" <Sameer(dot)Thakur(at)nttdata(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] VACUUM Progress Checker.
Date: 2015-07-17 22:39:18
Message-ID: 55A98416.2030405@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/15/15 11:38 PM, Thakur, Sameer wrote:
> Hello,
>> I am not really willing to show up as the picky guy here, but could it be possible to receive those patches as attached to emails instead of having them referenced by URL? I >imagine that you are directly using the nabble interface.
> Just configured a new mail client for nabble, did not know how to use it within an existing conversation.

Does this actually handle multiple indexes? It doesn't appear so, which
I'd think is a significant problem... :/

I'm also not seeing how this will deal with exhausting
maintenance_work_mem. ISTM that when that happens you'd definitely want
a better idea of what's going on...
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2015-07-17 22:42:53 Re: [PATCH] Function to get size of asynchronous notification queue
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2015-07-17 22:32:45 Re: dblink: add polymorphic functions.