Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.
Date: 2015-07-09 00:09:56
Message-ID: 559DBBD4.6020406@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/8/15 8:31 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> I understood.
> So I will place bunch of test like src/test/module/visibilitymap_test,
> which contains some tests regarding this feature,
> and gather them into one patch.
>
>
> Please place it in core. I see value in having a diagnostic function for
> general use on production systems.

+1. I don't think there's value to keeping this stuff away from DBAs.
Perhaps it should default to only SU being able to execute it though.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2015-07-09 01:50:39 Re: Improving log capture of TAP tests with IPC::Run
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-07-08 22:23:27 Re: PL/pgSQL, RAISE and error context