Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Date: 2015-06-24 19:41:22
Message-ID: 558B07E2.3020704@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6/24/15 3:13 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> Meh. The relevant branches already exist, as you can disable it today.
>
> We could also just change the default in the back branches.

One more argument for leaving everything alone. If users don't like it,
they can turn it off themselves.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-24 19:49:51 Re: Should we back-patch SSL renegotiation fixes?
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-06-24 19:15:35 Re: Trustly PostgreSQL Data Corruption Bug Bounty Program