Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?
Date: 2001-06-22 19:59:18
Message-ID: 5579.993239958@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I've been staring at the lock names for an hour now and the best name I've
> come up with is SHARE UPDATE EXCLUSIVE, as in "share update, otherwise
> exclusive" (the implication being that update would allow select as well),
> or some permutation thereof.

Okay with me, unless someone else comes up with a better idea...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-06-22 20:09:53 Re: Multiple Indexing, performance impact
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-06-22 19:58:20 Re: Good name for new lock type for VACUUM?