Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlog -> pg_xjournal?
Date: 2015-06-02 12:33:30
Message-ID: 556DA29A.707@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/02/2015 03:06 AM, Joel Jacobson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 6:35 AM, Michael Nolan <htfoot(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Why not take a simpler approach and create a zero length file in directories
>> that should not be fiddled with by non-experts using a file name something
>> like "DO.NOT.DELETE.THESE.FILES"?
> Then the smart sysadmin will say "but I didn't delete any *files*, I
> just deleted a log *directory*" :-)
>
>

Fire that sysadmin, not because they are incompetent but because either
they are an idiot or they think they can treat you as one.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-06-02 12:56:00 Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1
Previous Message Shulgin, Oleksandr 2015-06-02 12:23:03 Streaming replication for psycopg2