Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Date: 2015-05-28 20:11:44
Message-ID: 55677680.5080900@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 05/28/2015 04:05 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> On 05/28/2015 12:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>> JD,
>
>> What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar,
>> and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into
>> it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib
>> if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we
>> would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which
>> are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory.
>
> I am suggesting that things like citext be made a type proper. No
> install required.

This seems to come up regularly. Maybe we should put it in an FAQ
somewhere. The barriers to making non-core types into core types are
very very high, possibly insurmountable. This is pretty much not an option.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Gaetano Mendola 2015-05-28 20:14:33 useless assignment pointer argument
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2015-05-28 20:06:46 Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1