| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Run pgindent now? |
| Date: | 2015-05-27 21:45:01 |
| Message-ID: | 55663ADD.5010503@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/27/2015 05:19 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> And even if we got to the point where all commits should be perfectly
> pgindented, it wouldn't work, because under the current workflow the
> updated typedef list isn't available until after the commit (on an
> unpredictable schedule). (This problem would also affect pgindent in
> back branches.)
Up to date typedefs lists are available for all live branches all the
time. That's something I have enabled with a fairly modest investment of
time in response to this discussion. See
<http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/typedefs.pl?show_list> Of course,
there is a chicken and egg problem, but after all how many new typedefs
are there likely to be in a given backpatched item? ISTM new typedefs
are far more likely to appear from new development than from bug fixes.
At a pinch you could add some yourself manually.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Kehlet | 2015-05-27 22:09:27 | 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-27 21:36:59 | Re: Improving GEQO |