| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: How about to have relnamespace and relrole? |
| Date: | 2015-04-01 16:39:36 |
| Message-ID: | 551C1F48.9020800@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/01/2015 12:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> The only possible issue I see on reading the patches is that these are
>> treated differently for dependencies than other regFOO types. Rather
>> than create a dependency if a value is used in a default expression, an
>> error is raised if one is found. Are we OK with that?
> Why would it be a good idea to act differently from the others?
>
>
I have no idea.
It was mentioned here
<http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20150218.174231.125293096.horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
but nobody seems to have commented. I'm not sure why it was done like
this. Adding the dependencies seems to be no harder than raising the
exception. I think we can kick this back to the author to fix.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-01 16:46:05 | Re: Tables cannot have INSTEAD OF triggers |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-04-01 16:38:44 | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch |