Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
Date: 2015-03-31 17:49:06
Message-ID: 551ADE12.50900@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 03/31/2015 04:20 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:

>> I believe that Heikki said he'd backpatch that when 9.4 was considered
>> very stable. I don't think that we've reached that level of confidence
>> in the invasive B-Tree bugfixes that went into 9.4 yet.
>
> I have no intention to backpatch the changes. Too big, too invasive.

I can certainly appreciate that.

> Perhaps we could consider it after a year or two, once 9.4 is indeed
> very stable, but at that point you have to wonder if it's really worth
> the trouble anymore. If someone has runs into that issue frequently, he
> probably should just upgrade to 9.4.

Ouch. That is a really poor way to look at this.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-03-31 17:51:59 Re: Bug #10432 failed to re-find parent key in index
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2015-03-31 17:26:24 Re: vac truncation scan problems