From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Exposing PG_VERSION_NUM in pg_config |
Date: | 2015-03-31 00:40:14 |
Message-ID: | 5519ECEE.9030608@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/30/15 6:29 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
> <mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>> wrote:
>
> On 3/25/15 1:32 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > Well, I have no other cases than ones of the type mentioned upthread,
> > and honestly I am fine as long as we do not apply maths to a version
> > string. So attached is a patch that adds VERSION_NUM in
> > Makefile.global.
>
> How would you make use of this in an extension makefile?
>
>
> One use case is regression test list filtering depending on backend version.
I'm interested in the exact syntax you'd use, to compare it to the
currently used techniques.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-03-31 00:59:21 | pg_rewind tests |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-03-31 00:26:26 | Re: WIP: multivariate statistics / proof of concept |