| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
| Date: | 2006-09-15 20:25:15 |
| Message-ID: | 5519.1158351915@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> However, there seems to be a difference of opinion as to what constitutes
> "justification." Establishing with us that we need an authenticated
> voting interface, and easy content management for stuff like donor
> information and meeting minutes, is justification.
Um ... how does "we need service X" translate to "we need service X to
be provided on a new hostname rather than www.postgresql.org"? Maybe
I'm missing something, but I thought the objection was to hostname
proliferation not service proliferation.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2006-09-15 20:27:42 | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2006-09-15 20:15:04 | Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org? |