From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Matt Mello <alien(at)spaceship(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: 1 char in the world |
Date: | 2003-01-29 23:59:26 |
Message-ID: | 5513.1043884766@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Matt Mello <alien(at)spaceship(dot)com> writes:
> Is that true if I have a table that consists of lots of 1-char fields?
> For example, if I have a table with 4 billion records, which consist of
> (20) 1-char fields each, then the storage for the data will be something
> like 5 times as large if I use TEXT than if I use "char".
Probably more like 8 times as large, when you allow for alignment
padding --- on most machines, TEXT fields will be aligned on 4-byte
boundaries, so several TEXT fields in a row will take up 8 bytes apiece,
vs one byte apiece for consecutive "char" or bool fields.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andras Kadinger | 2003-01-30 01:02:49 | Re: Query plan and Inheritance. Weird behavior |
Previous Message | Matt Mello | 2003-01-29 23:29:58 | Re: 1 char in the world |