Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Superuser connect during smart shutdown
Date: 2015-03-20 23:44:03
Message-ID: 550CB0C3.1020507@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/20/15 9:44 AM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 03:10:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>>>> I've certainly objected to it in the past, but I don't
>>>>>> believe I was the only one objecting.
>>>>>
>>>>> What's your feeling now?
>>>>
>>>> I'm prepared to yield on the point.
>>>
>>> OK, are we up for changing the default pg_ctl shutdown method for
>>> 9.5, ("smart" to "fast"), or should we wait for 9.6?
>>
>> I'm up for it. I think it's long overdue.
>
> +1

+1, but I also like the idea of allowing SU to connect during a smart
shutdown. Even if you've intentionally chosen smart instead of fast it
still sucks that you can't find out what's actually holding things up
(and ps isn't that great a solution).
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2015-03-20 23:51:51 Re: GSoC 2015: Extra Jsonb functionality
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2015-03-20 23:27:40 Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position