Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Date: 2006-12-28 00:11:55
Message-ID: 55062.24.211.165.134.1167264715.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 06:22:17PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> The problem with that is that "AS foo" already has a meaning, and it's
>>> not this one.
>
>> How about "AS (foo)" ?
>
> What if you want to specify an alias? This doesn't work:
>
> FROM myverylongfunctionname(...) AS alias(typename)
>
> because, again, that syntax already has a meaning.
>
> You could possibly do something with a cast:
>
> FROM CAST(myfunc(...) AS typename) [ AS alias ]
>
> This is at least syntactically OK. Not sure what the implementation
> issues might be.
>

For some time now I have wanted to genaralise the use of LIKE in type
expressions, which might perhaps fit David's need. Something like

SELECT * from foo() AS bar (LIKE blurfl);

The nice thing about this is that you could augment the type expression:

SELECT * from foo() AS bar (extra_info text, LIKE blurfl);

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2006-12-28 00:37:24 Re: (SETOF) RECORD AS complex_type
Previous Message Roman Kononov 2006-12-27 23:47:05 Re: [BUGS] BUG #2846: inconsistent and confusing handling