Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters
Date: 2015-03-10 16:07:56
Message-ID: 54FF16DC.1040009@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/03/15 17:01, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> 2015-03-10 16:50 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
> <mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>>:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com <mailto:robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>>
> writes:
>
> > Committed with a few documentation tweaks.
>
> Was there any consideration given to whether ruleutils should start
> printing NamedArgExprs with "=>"? Or do we think that needs to wait?
>
>
> I didn't think about it? I don't see any reason why it have to use
> deprecated syntax.
>

There is one, loading the output into older version of Postgres. Don't
know if that's important one though.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-03-10 16:11:57 Re: Precedence of standard comparison operators
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2015-03-10 16:07:29 Re: proposal: searching in array function - array_position