Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Venkata Balaji N <nag1010(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB
Date: 2015-03-03 18:21:32
Message-ID: 54F5FBAC.4000600@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/03/2015 10:15 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 03/02/2015 11:25 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I propose that we remove the comment from max_wal_size, and also remove
>> the "in milliseconds" from wal_receiver_timeout and
>> autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay.
>
> +1
>

Actually, let's be consistent about this. It makes no sense to remove
unit comments from some settings which accept ms but not others.

Do we want to remove unit comments from all settings which accept
"MB,GB" or "ms,s,min"? There's more than a few. I'd be in favor of
this, but seems like (a) it should be universal, and (b) its own patch.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-03 18:28:58 Re: Comparing primary/HS standby in tests
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2015-03-03 18:15:32 Re: Patch: raise default for max_wal_segments to 1GB