On Jan 12, 2011, at 1:07 AM, David E. Wheeler wrote:

> On Jan 11, 2011, at 2:25 PM, Alexey Klyukin wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> Here's the patch that improves handling of arrays as pl/perl function input
>> arguments, converting postgres arrays of arbitrary dimensions into perl array
>> references.
> 
> Awesome! I've wanted this for *years*.
> 
>> It includes regression tests and a documentation changes, and it
>> builds and runs successfully on my mac os x and linux boxes. To maintain
>> compatibility with existing pl/perl code a new variable,
>> plperl.convert_array_arguments (better name?), is introduced. Its default
>> value is false, when set to true it triggers the new behavior, i.e.
> 
> Have you considered instead passing an array-based object with is string overloading designed to return the pg array string format? That would make for nice, transparent compatibility without the need for a GUC.

You mean packing both a string representation and a reference to a single SV * value?

I haven't considered that (lack of extensive perlgus-foo) although I think that's an interesting idea. One drawback would be that it would require both conversion to a string format and to a perl reference, performing unnecessary actions during every time arrays are passed to a pl/perl function. If there is a strong dislike of the proposed 'compatibility' GUC option - I think I can change the existing patch to incorporate array string representation into the reference-holding SV quite easily.

/A

--
Alexey Klyukin
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

• Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] at 2011-01-11 23:07:53 from David E. Wheeler

Responses

• Re: arrays as pl/perl input arguments [PATCH] at 2011-01-12 18:52:42 from David E. Wheeler

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Noah Misch	Date: 2011-01-12 13:14:51
	Subject: Re: ALTER TYPE 1: recheck index-based constraints
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2011-01-12 13:07:47
	Subject: Re: pg_depend explained