| From: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Partitioning WIP patch |
| Date: | 2015-02-26 01:31:02 |
| Message-ID: | 54EE7756.2050105@BlueTreble.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/25/15 7:24 PM, Amit Langote wrote:
>> >Does ALTER TABLE parent_monthly_xxxxx_201401 ADD COLUMN foo still
>> >operate the same as today? I'd like to see us continue to support that,
>> >but perhaps it would be wise to not paint ourselves into that corner
>> >just yet.
> Nothing prevents that from working, at least at the moment.
Ok, but is that what we really want? If we release it that way we'll be
stuck with it forever.
I would certainly prefer that we support the capabilities of inheritance
along with partitioning (because in some cases you want both). But it's
going to limit what we can do internally.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-02-26 01:36:49 | Re: contrib/fuzzystrmatch/dmetaphone.c license |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2015-02-26 01:28:34 | Re: Partitioning WIP patch |