Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: binworld and install-binworld targets - was Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand
Date: 2015-02-05 01:20:49
Message-ID: 54D2C571.8030701@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 02/04/2015 06:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Or maybe use a make variable, like NO_DOC. I think that's preferable to
>> adding more targets.
> Unless we can come up with a new target name that obviously means
> "world minus docs", the make-variable idea may be the best.
>
>

I'm not terribly keen on this. If you don't like "binworld", how about
"world-no-docs"?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-05 01:24:49 Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE
Previous Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2015-02-05 01:20:15 Re: pg_basebackup may fail to send feedbacks.