Re: Getting rid of LSEG.m

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Getting rid of LSEG.m
Date: 2015-02-03 16:52:48
Message-ID: 54D0FCE0.4010507@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/03/2015 06:47 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Or perhaps we should just remove both the field and the ifdef'd
> assignments. That's a bit more drastic but I can't really see
> this code ever coming back to life ... especially since the notion
> of a field that's not stored on disk but is valid in in-memory
> copies seems impossibly error-prone. Most functions can have no
> idea whether their input is residing in a disk buffer or not.
> And adding the bookkeeping to determine that would surely cost
> more than just recomputing the slope when needed.

+1 for removing it altogether.

- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-02-03 16:53:06 Re: Release note bloat is getting out of hand
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-03 16:47:40 Getting rid of LSEG.m