Re: Commitfest problems

From: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Commitfest problems
Date: 2014-12-11 21:12:30
Message-ID: 548A08BE.5050407@joeconway.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/11/2014 01:07 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 03:47:29PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 12/11/14 1:35 AM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> I have heard repeated concerns about the commitfest process in
>>> the past few months. The fact we have been in a continual
>>> commitfest since August also is concerning.
>>
>> I realized the other day, I'm embracing the idea of a continual
>> commitfest.
>>
>> I'm still working on patches from the last commitfest. Why not?
>> They didn't expire. Sure, it would have been nicer to get them
>> done sooner, but what are you gonna do? The fact that Nov 15 <
>> now < Dec 15 isn't going to change the fact that I have a few
>> hours to spare right now and the patches are still relevant.
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned, we might as well just have one
>> commitfest per major release. Call it a patch list. Make the
>> list sortable by created date and last-updated date, and let the
>> system police itself. At least that's honest.
>
> Wow, that's radical, and interesting.

Actually, to me it sounds a lot like what we did 10 years ago before
the commitfests except with a way to track the patches (other than the
mail archives) and more people participating in patch reviews.

Joe

- --
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=hSWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-12-11 21:16:47 Re: PATCH: hashjoin - gracefully increasing NTUP_PER_BUCKET instead of batching
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2014-12-11 21:07:52 Re: Commitfest problems