Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST support for inet datatypes
Date: 2016-08-23 19:20:05
Message-ID: 5488.1471980005@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've pushed this patch with mostly (not entirely) cosmetic adjustments.
I still think it'd be worth looking into why the produced index is larger
than the GiST equivalent, and for that matter exactly why the GiST
equivalent is so much slower to search.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Antonin Houska 2016-08-23 19:39:33 Re: Question about MVCC-unsafe commands
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-08-23 19:10:37 Re: [PATCH] Transaction traceability - txid_status(bigint)