Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)

From: Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_background (and more parallelism infrastructure patches)
Date: 2014-10-08 20:16:21
Message-ID: 54359B95.1070800@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 08/10/14 21:03, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:09 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> WRT my complaint in the other subthread, I think PQsendMethods should
>> just be renamed to PQcommMethods or similar. That'd, in combination with
>> a /* at some point we might want to add methods for receiving data here
>> */ looks like it'd already satisfy my complaint ;)
>
> Well, I'm happy enough to go ahead and change that, if that's all it
> takes to make you happy. Is it?
>
> So far the status of these patches AIUI is:
>
> #1 - Just committed, per discussion last week.
> #2 - No comments, possibly because it's pretty boring.

Yeah there is nothing much to say there, it can just go in.

> #4 - No comments.

I think I said I like it which I meant as I think it's good as it is, no
objections to committing that one either.

> #6 - Updated per Amit's feedback. Not sure if anyone else wants to
> review. Still needs docs.
>

I'd like to see this one when it's updated since I lost track a little
about how the changes looks like exactly.

--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-08 20:26:37 Re: UPSERT wiki page, and SQL MERGE syntax
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-08 20:16:04 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}