From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Rukh Meski <rukh(dot)meski(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Last Commitfest patches waiting review |
Date: | 2014-09-29 14:16:23 |
Message-ID: | 542969B7.4060703@vmware.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/27/2014 05:12 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
>> [ unreviewed patches ]
>
>> Grouping Sets
>
>> There has been a lot of discussion, but no decisions. See
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/87vbodhtvb.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk.
>
>> Would a committer be interested to take responsibility of this? If not,
>> this will just linger indefinitely.
>
> I should and will take this, but not in this commitfest: I've been just
> horribly busy lately with both work and personal issues. If we can punt
> it to the next fest, I will promise to work on it then.
Ok, thanks! I moved this to next commitfest and put your name on it as
reviewer.
>> INNER JOIN removals
>
>> The latest patch is significantly different from what was originally
>> submitted for the commitfest, so I wouldn't feel bad just bumping this
>> to the next one. I'll do that unless someone picks this up soon.
>> Tom: I know you're busy with the more urgent jsonb patch.. Do you think
>> you would find the time to review this anytime soon? Anyone else?
>
> Same deal here.
I marked this as "Returned with feedback", as the trigger-queue issue
seems like a show-stopper.
>> Selectivity estimation for inet operators
>
>> I think there's a bug in the estimation of semi-joins, see
>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5423DC8D.3080206@vmware.com. But I
>> think we could split this patch into two, and commit the non-join
>> selectivity estimator first, as that seems OK. If no-one else steps up
>> to the plate, I can do that..
>
> And I'd like to look this one over too ...
Ok, punted this to next commitfest too.
- Heikki
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-09-29 14:21:25 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-09-29 14:12:25 | Re: Patch to support SEMI and ANTI join removal |