Re: PL/pgSQL 2

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Álvaro Hernández Tortosa <aht(at)nosys(dot)es>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL 2
Date: 2014-09-04 15:54:47
Message-ID: 54088B47.6040005@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 09/04/2014 02:48 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> To take another example, I've been complaining about the fact
> that PostgreSQL 8.3+ requires far more typecasts in stored procedures
> than any other database I'm aware of for years, probably since before
> I joined EnterpriseDB.

+10

This still drives me nuts, and it's a serious problem for ORM users too.

The idea that we won't accept a 'text' typed input for an 'xml' or
'json' field is IMO absurdly and needlessly pedantic. I've not yet seen
an argument for what problems this solves.

I know why the changes in 8.3 were made, and they're clearly beneficial
overall, but we need to start putting some more implicit casts from text
to text-like types in, especially where there's no SQL-standard type
that users of JDBC etc can easily use in mappings.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-04 15:56:38 Re: Join push-down support for foreign tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-04 15:51:59 Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2