Re: What's the point of json_extract_path_op etc?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: What's the point of json_extract_path_op etc?
Date: 2014-06-26 15:38:14
Message-ID: 53AC3E66.1080306@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 06/25/2014 02:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Why do we have essentially duplicate pg_proc entries for json_extract_path
> and json_extract_path_op? The latter is undocumented and seems only to be
> used as the infrastructure for the #> operator. I see that only the
> former is marked variadic, but AFAIK the operator machinery couldn't care
> less about that, so it seems to me we could get rid of the
> json_extract_path_op entry and point the operator at json_extract_path.
>
> Likewise for json_extract_path_text_op, jsonb_extract_path_op, and
> jsonb_extract_path_text_op.
>
>

ISTR trying that and running into problems, maybe with opr_sanity checks.

But if you can get rid of them cleanly then by all means do.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2014-06-26 16:14:39 Re: NUMA packaging and patch
Previous Message Claudio Freire 2014-06-26 15:19:59 Re: NUMA packaging and patch