Re: "Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful" categorized as Mostly Harmless

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: "Considerer Harmful Considered Harmful" categorized as Mostly Harmless
Date: 2014-04-30 13:05:50
Message-ID: 5360F52E.10800@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 04/30/2014 02:53 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 04/30/2014 02:35 AM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 04/30/2014 01:27 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>>> * Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
>>>> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>>>> ... so let's stop using that phrase, OK?
>>>>> http://meyerweb.com/eric/comment/chech.html
>>>>
>>>> Shrug ... what I see there is a rant from a guy with no sense of
>>>> humor.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> 'pfffft', I say.
>>
>> I wasn't sure if the whole article was a parody.
>>
>>
>
>
> The rebuttal would be: "'Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful"
> Considered Harmful.
>
> Don't you just love recursion?

Nah, I'd categorize it as "Mostly Harmless" :)

Cheers

--
Hannu Krosing
PostgreSQL Consultant
Performance, Scalability and High Availability
2ndQuadrant Nordic OÜ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-04-30 14:51:41 Display of timestamp in pg_dump custom format
Previous Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-04-30 12:55:44 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC on WAL-logging hash indexes