| From: | Jim Nasby <jim(at)nasby(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred(at)freebsd(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |
| Date: | 2014-04-21 22:08:45 |
| Message-ID: | 535596ED.2000204@nasby.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/21/14, 4:08 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> If the community had more *BSD presence I think it would be great but it isn't all that viable at this point. I do know however that no-one in this community would turn down a team of FreeBSD advocates helping us make PostgreSQL awesome for PostgreSQL.
I assume you meant FreeBSD awesome for PostgreSQL? :)
I'm also a big fan of *BSD but the reality is it's MUCH harder to get *BSD into a corporation than linux. Now, if FreeBSD had a bunch of stuff that made PostgreSQL run like 4x faster on *BSD than Linux that would be a different story.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect jim(at)nasby(dot)net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2014-04-21 22:26:37 | Re: Clock sweep not caching enough B-Tree leaf pages? |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-04-21 21:25:35 | Re: Perfomance degradation 9.3 (vs 9.2) for FreeBSD |