Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c
Date: 2010-04-02 22:07:37
Message-ID: 5326.1270246057@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped. configure/configure.in still
> say 9.0devel.

Sure, because the tag is on a branch. According to the commit message
that went by, Robert did that correctly:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-03/msg00378.php

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2010-04-02 22:54:19 Re: Alpha release this week?
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2010-04-02 21:50:41 pgsql: Check compulsory parameters in recovery.conf in standby_mode, per