Re: revisiting unix domain sockets

Here's a quick diff if anyone is interested.
https://gist.github.com/Downchuck/8531692

Needs JNA in the class path. Seems to work.

We've released this under the same license as pgjdbc.
https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/blob/master/LICENSE

Uses ?unixSocket= as the parameter for the path.

-Charles

On 12/17/2013 4:25 AM, Dave Cramer wrote:
> Send a PR and I'll look at it.
>
> Dave Cramer
>
> dave.cramer(at)credativ(dot)ca
> http://www.credativ.ca
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 6:01 AM, Charles Pritchard <chuck(at)jumis(dot)com
> <mailto:chuck(at)jumis(dot)com>> wrote:
>
> Has there been any movement and-or push back around supporting
> unix domain sockets within the connection string? I've seen simple
> patches on the web to add support- it seems like a trivial matter,
> is there a design consideration or other issue outstanding?
>
> Example of using JNA for unix domain sockets:
> http://www.productivity.org/projects/mysqlunixsocket/MysqlUnixSocketFactory.java
>
> -Charles
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-jdbc mailing list (pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
> <mailto:pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-jdbc
>
>