Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

From: "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT
Date: 2008-03-14 16:33:37
Message-ID: 528853D3C5ED2C4AA8990B504BA7FB850106DF14@sol.transas.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers


The previous results were received on PG 8.3 version:

"PostgreSQL 8.3.0, compiled by Visual C++ build 1400"

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us]
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2008 7:19 PM
To: Zubkovsky, Sergey
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org; pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

[ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php
]

"Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com> writes:
> Here is my example.

Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in
all these cases, which is what I'd expect. (The exact value
could vary across platforms, of course.)

You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version
of stat(2) isn't trustworthy?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guillaume Lelarge 2008-03-14 16:47:39 Small typo in install-win32.sgml
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-14 16:19:20 Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-03-14 16:39:10 Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-03-14 16:19:20 Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT