| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| Date: | 2008-03-14 16:19:20 |
| Message-ID: | 19332.1205511560@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
[ moved to -hackers --- see original thread here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2008-03/msg00039.php
]
"Zubkovsky, Sergey" <Sergey(dot)Zubkovsky(at)transas(dot)com> writes:
> Here is my example.
Hmm ... on my Fedora machine I get the same result (704512) in
all these cases, which is what I'd expect. (The exact value
could vary across platforms, of course.)
You said you were using the MinGW build --- maybe MinGW's version
of stat(2) isn't trustworthy?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zubkovsky, Sergey | 2008-03-14 16:33:37 | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Zubkovsky, Sergey | 2008-03-14 15:23:22 | Re: pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zubkovsky, Sergey | 2008-03-14 16:33:37 | Re: [DOCS] pg_total_relation_size() and CHECKPOINT |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-03-14 16:09:55 | Re: PROC_VACUUM_FOR_WRAPAROUND doesn't work expectedly |