| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
| Date: | 2013-11-13 19:34:11 |
| Message-ID: | 5283D433.3040406@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Tom,
> There's an abbreviated version of this argument in the comments in
> my proposed patch at
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/11927.1384199294@sss.pgh.pa.us
> What I'm hoping will happen next is that the complainants will hot-patch
> that and see if it fixes their problems. We can't really determine
> what to do without that information.
Unfortunately, the original reporter of this issue will not be available
for testing for 2-3 weeks, and I haven't been able to devise a synthetic
test which clearly shows the issue.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2013-11-13 20:14:09 | Re: Performance bug in prepared statement binding in 9.2? |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2013-11-13 15:03:05 | Re: Horrific time for getting 1 record from an index? |