Re: Turkish downcasting in PL/pgSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: ntufar <ntufar(at)pisem(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, devrim(at)tdmsoft(dot)com
Subject: Re: Turkish downcasting in PL/pgSQL
Date: 2004-08-14 16:03:16
Message-ID: 5273.1092499396@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I have tried running flex (2.5.4) with a number of different locales
> including tr_TR, but the output file is always the same. Can you show
> us a diff of the generated files?

Hmm ... a quick look at the flex sources shows that flex does rely on
the <ctype.h> routines for case-folding, so I have no doubt that
ntufar's report is accurate. Maybe you used the wrong tr_TR locale?

(Just for the record, though, I can't see any change in the generated
pl_scan.c output in any of the tr_TR variants available on either HPUX
or OS X. I don't have a full set of locales installed on my Linux
machine so I can't try it there.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim J. 2004-08-14 22:22:56 Configure error Beta 8.0.0
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-14 15:21:46 Re: Turkish downcasting in PL/pgSQL

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-08-14 16:48:30 Re: 7.4 backpatches
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-08-14 15:29:46 Re: will PITR in 8.0 be usable for "hot spare"/"log shipping" type of replication