| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BEOS code |
| Date: | 2005-09-17 05:46:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5268.1126935994@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Can we remove the BEOS-specific code? I don't think anyone has reported
> it working for quite a few releases. If someone wants to take it up
> later, they can pull from the CVS commit that removed it.
I think pulling it during beta is inappropriate: there's some small risk
of breaking things and no real gain. But feel free to put that on TODO
for 8.2.
I suggest that the QNX4 port is just as dead.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2005-09-17 06:50:21 | Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-09-17 05:40:28 | Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches |