| From: | Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Date: | 2013-08-28 04:34:06 |
| Message-ID: | 521D7DBE.8080902@darrenduncan.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2013.08.27 7:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Darren Duncan <darren(at)darrenduncan(dot)net> writes:
>> I have a proposal.
>
>> Assuming we decide to do away with RULEs,
>
> You lost me already.
>
> If we had replacement functionality for everything that can be done with
> rules, we could start to think about when we might begin to tell people
> they can't use rules. Unfortunately, we don't have that precondition.
>
> regards, tom lane
That's a really old post/thread, and I'm not arguing for any kind of action
related to RULEs, please disregard the message. -- Darren Duncan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2013-08-28 04:42:57 | Re: Clarification on materialized view restriction needed |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-08-28 04:16:41 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |