Re: plpython implementation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com
Cc: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: plpython implementation
Date: 2013-07-01 20:30:40
Message-ID: 51D1E6F0.5070801@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7/1/13 1:29 AM, james wrote:
> Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used
> outside
> of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
> 'promoting' pllua?

You can start promoting pllua by making it work with current PostgreSQL
versions. It hasn't been updated in 5 years, and doesn't build cleanly
last I checked.

Having a well-maintained and fully featured pllua available would surely
be welcome by many.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2013-07-01 20:31:59 Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-07-01 20:30:14 Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information