From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | james(at)mansionfamily(dot)plus(dot)com |
Cc: | Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Szymon Guz <mabewlun(at)gmail(dot)com>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: plpython implementation |
Date: | 2013-07-01 20:30:40 |
Message-ID: | 51D1E6F0.5070801@gmx.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7/1/13 1:29 AM, james wrote:
> Given how useful it is to have a scripting language that can be used
> outside
> of the database as well as inside it, would it be reasonable to consider
> 'promoting' pllua?
You can start promoting pllua by making it work with current PostgreSQL
versions. It hasn't been updated in 5 years, and doesn't build cleanly
last I checked.
Having a well-maintained and fully featured pllua available would surely
be welcome by many.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Claudio Freire | 2013-07-01 20:31:59 | Re: Randomisation for ensuring nlogn complexity in quicksort |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-07-01 20:30:14 | Re: GIN improvements part 1: additional information |